Bane NOR is portrayed as a government agency struggling with complex governance structures, detailed management from political bodies, and unclear roles, leading to leadership instability and operational inefficiencies. Former CEO Thor Gjermund Eriksen highlights systemic issues, including excessive political interference and a lack of respect for organizational roles. The agency is also criticized for costly PR initiatives, such as an expensive podcast, and delays in critical infrastructure projects like the Oslo-Tønsberg railway. Environmental considerations, such as halting construction for a bird's nest, are seen as excessive. While Bane NOR's role in Norway's railway network is acknowledged, its management and execution are frequently questioned.
Podcasts like 'Topplederpodcast' and 'SLØSEPRAT' provide critical insights, highlighting bureaucratic inefficiencies and public sector frustrations. Discussions in 'Peiling med Noresjø og Hagen' and 'Frokostshowet på P5' emphasize infrastructure delays and environmental over-caution. These sources collectively paint a negative picture of Bane NOR's management and priorities.
Bureaucratic inefficiency, political interference, infrastructure delays, PR spending, environmental over-caution, leadership instability, and governance complexity.
The discussions revolve around systemic issues in Bane NOR's governance, excessive political control, delays in critical projects, costly PR initiatives, and environmental measures perceived as excessive. Leadership turnover and unclear roles further exacerbate these challenges, reflecting broader public sector frustrations.
Yksityiskohtainen erittely julkisesta sentimentistä ja keskusteluista tästä yrityksestä.
Katso miten tämä yksikkö vertautuu kilpailijoihin avainmittareilla.